Dharma - Merit - Meditation - Nectar - Liberation - Emptiness - Process - Awakening

Studies
in Buddhadharma

On the Buddhist Canon

The Theravāda Scriptures
The Mahāyāna Scriptures
The Treasure-house of Tibetan Buddhism
The Wish-Fulfilling Gem Goes West ?
Critical Considerations

"The wise are never arbitrary when leading others into harmony with the truth. Wise, they are guarded by truth, for they act in accord with the Dharma." - Dhammapada, verses 256 & 257.

"... the heart of the matter is that even with their differences, all the Buddhist traditions are fundamentally of one taste. Please hold this as the highest and most essential understanding."
Zangpo, Chökyi : Points to Remember about the View.

All extant Buddhist scriptures, written in various Asian tongues, take up several library-shelves. Their history of composition is rather complex and the status of many parts is still under dispute.

 The Theravāda Scriptures

1. The Pāli Canon :

Fortunately, there is a consensus of sorts about certain texts written in Pāli, an Indian dialect probably close to Magadhan, the language spoken by the Buddha. Considered foundational by Theravāda Buddhists in Sri Lanka, Burma & Thailand, the Pāli Canon was first orally preserved. The earliest texts go back to the time of Buddha Śākyamuni. The canon was probably written down only as late as the first century BCE, but because of the mnemotechnics involved (cf. the formulaic, repetitive, poetical style), their correct transmission in not under dispute. In many Western minds, used to fundamental theology based on revealed scripture, this has given rise to the flawed idea "real" Buddhism can be found in the Pāli Canon rather than in the practice of historical & contemporary Buddhist practitioners.

Indeed, despite the Pāli Canon, we only know approximately what the historical Buddha really said. It is not impossible people lost touch with the interpretative contexts of the surviving discourses. Given humour and irony were not foreign to the Buddha, makes it even more difficult to understand these texts as literal accounts of the religious life of their time.

According to tradition, the oldest discourses ("sūtra" in Sanskrit and "sutta" in Pāli) of the Pāli Canon, like the Basket of Disciplinary Code (Vinaya-pitaka) and the Basket of Discourses (Sūtra-pitaka) were codified at the First Buddhist Council (ca. 480 BCE), held shortly after the Buddha entered "parinirvāna". There were 499 Arhats plus Ānanda present. On the basis of Upāli's account, the rules of discipline were set down, and on the basis of Ānanda's the Sūtra-pitaka. Then the text upon which all agreed was recited and thus memorized. Many doubt the historicity of this tale, but it reflects how the early schools conceived the process of canonization. That a first collection of texts was made relatively early, is however not in doubt.

Around 345 BCE, a Second Council with 700 Arhats was held at Vaishālī. Better documented, it is recognized as a historical event. The greater party (later to become the Mahāsānghikas) refused to accept the addition of rules to the Vinaya by the smaller party (later to become the Sthaviras).

Although disunity in matters of discipline was the reason for its convocation, in the Singhalese tradition of the Theravāda, the ideological schism between the Sthaviras and Mahāsānghikas (ca. bhiksu Mahādeva, ca. 320 BCE), was considered to be the conflict leading up to it. However, other sources state the schism took place on the basis of differences over the rules of conduct ("vinaya"), and not over matters of doctrine, as would be the case later.

Scholars conjecture another meeting took place in the same period. This Council at Pātaliputra (ca. 308 BCE) is not recognized by the Pāli school of Sri Lanka and deemed sectarian. Further less important councils were held during the next centuries.

In Sanskrit, "tripitaka" or "Three Baskets", designates the Pāli Canon, the scriptures of the so-called Lesser Vehicle ("Hīnayāna") accepted by all Buddhists and partly considered authentic by hermeneutical science. These three baskets consist of :

• the Vinaya-pitaka : (Basket of Disciplinary Code) accounts of the origin of the Buddhist community or "sangha" and the rules of discipline regulating the life of monks & nuns ;

• the Sūtra-pitaka : (Basket of Discourses) discourses spoken by Buddha Śakyamuni or his immediate disciples, organized in five collections ("āgamas" in Sanskrit or "nikāya" in Pāli) :
  Dīrghāgama (Dīgha-nikāya) : the "Long Collection", made up of 34 long sūtras ;
  Madhyamāgama (Majjhima-nikāya) : the "Middle Collection" of 152 medium length sūtras ;
  Samyuktāgama (Samyutta-nikāya) : the "Unified or Connected Collection" of 2.800 short sūtras ;
  Ekottarāgama (Anguttara-nikāya) : the "Graduated Collection, eleven sections with 2.300 sūtras ;
  Ksudrakāgama (Khuddaka-nikāya) : "Short Collection" of fifteen short miscellaneous texts ;

• the Abhidharma-pitaka : (Basket of the Special Teaching) : compendium of Buddhist psychology & philosophy grown out or built around technical concepts. Although some of these may have been introduced by the Buddha (cf. the tradition claiming the Abidharma was recited during the First Council), the bulk was composed between the 3th century and the first century BCE. Two complete baskets have survived : the Theravādin (South-East Asia) and the Sarvāstivādin (North-West Asia). The latter, composed in Sanskrit, survived only in Chinese and Tibetan translations.

Those oldest portions of the Pāli Canon narrowly concerning the Buddha, like the Basket of Discourses and the Basket of Disciplinary Code, were, like the rest of the discourses, not written down until three or four hundred years after the physical demise of the Buddha. Because of the oral & social methods used to safeguard his words, they were most likely better kept & transmitted than we imagine today.

The Pāli textual tradition seems to stabilize about 100 CE onwards. At this point the earliest Mahāyāna Sūtras are already extant ! So the notion "real" Buddhism is to be found in the Pāli Canon rather than in historical and/or contemporary Buddhist practice is, to say the least, questionable.

2. The Sarvāstivāda Canon :

Under the reign of King Ashoka the Great (304 - 232 BCE), the Sarvāstivādins or "teaching that says everything is", splits off from the Sthaviras, the "adherents of the elders". They have their own canon, composed in Sanskrit, partly preserved in Chinese & Tibetan translations. The Abidharma of the Sarvāstivāda school is considerably different from that of the Theravāda school.

 The Mahāyāna Scriptures

1. The Prajńāpāramita literature :

These sūtras were attributed to the Second & Third Turnings of the Wheel of Dharma by Buddha Śākyamuni.

The centuries either side of the start of the common era mark the rise of new sūtras, texts not belonging to the Tripitaka. In the earliest sūtras of this new movement (the Saddharma-pundarīka Sūtra or Lotus Sutra), the word "yāna" is used in the broader sense of "way" or "path". Eventually, this "new way" identified itself as "Mahāyāna", or "Great Way", a term becoming current only as late as the 4th century. Former Buddhist schools were dubbed "Hīnayāna", or "Lesser Way" ... The distinction is foremost quantitative : the Greater Vehicle have a universal salvic aim, Buddhahood for all sentient beings, while the Lesser Vehicle seeks personal liberation only.

Early Mahāyāna texts like the Saddharma-pundarīka Sūtra & the Astasāhasrikā-prajńāpāramita Sūtra lack key Mahāyāna terms. The Vajracchedikā Sūtra & the Kāśyapa-parivarta Sūtra do not even mention the Bodhisattva ideal. These early Mahāyānists seem primarily concerned with the Abidharma schools, the status of the Buddha & the relevance of lay versus monastic status to spiritual realization.

From the first century CE to the middle of the first millennium CE, a vast variety of Mahāyāna literature is produced and its important sūtras mainly focus on the ideal of the Bodhisattva, cultivating "Bodhicitta". Many define themselves as "vaipulya" or "expanded", implying acceptance and knowledge of the teaching of the mainstream scriptures, but adding a more comprehensive perspective of the Dharma, particularly in terms of wisdom & compassion.

The Mahāyana is not an institutional segregation, for there never was a Mahāyana Vinaya ! Mahāyānists are ordained within the "nikāyas" of non-Mahāyāna schools (in Tibet, all monks abide by the Sarvāstivāda Vinaya). Becoming a Mahāyānist is like expanding the Lesser Vehicle. The "sūtra" part of the Bodhisattva training (the Great Perfection Vehicle) does not contradict the teachings of the Lesser Vehicle, but "expands" them.

The Sutric Bodhisattva achieves Buddhahood for the sake of all sentient beings.

2. The Tantric literature :

These sūtras were attributed to the Fourth Turning of the Wheel of Dharma and are intimately connected with the Third Turning.

Within the context of the Mahāyāna, Buddhist Tantra gave rise to again a completely new body of texts. The emergence of this first phase of Vajrayāna or "Adamantine Vehicle", the third phase of Indian Buddhism, dates from the early 2nd century CE (other names for it are "Tantrayāna" & "Mantrayāna"). Its earliest tantras are from the "kriyā" tantra class (Action Tantra) and were translated into Chinese from the 3rd century. This expansion of the Mahāyāna consists in the adoption of additional "turbo" technology ("upaya", or "skillful means") rather than in wisdom ("prajńā"). In particular, rituals, specific yogic techniques & the use of Deity Yoga are outstanding.

This "esoteric" Buddhism remained Indian, secretive & a private minority interest until the 8th century, when, with the arising of the Pāla dynasty of Bihar & Bengal (760 - 1142 CE), the Vajrayāna entered the great universities. Buddhist Tantra then becomes international. This second phase marks the origin of the Vajrayāna proper, including its symbolism, terminology & ritual. The latter is adaptive to circumstance, uses the "standard" subtle apparatus of Indian yoga (the Vajra-body of winds, channels, wheels  & drops), adding the wisdom of seeing reality as it is, i.e. empty & interdependent. It was largely from the Indian universities at Vikramaśīla and Odantapurī that Buddhism was taken to Tibet.

The Tantric Bodhisattva achieves Buddhahood for the sake of all sentient beings as soon as possible.

 The Treasure-House of Tibetan Buddhism

The stages of the history of Tibetan Buddhism run parallel with the founding of its five major schools, less differentiated on doctrine than on practice and hosting all tenets on emptiness. All orders follow the "vanaya" of the Mūla-Sarvāstivāda School, the standard since the founding of the first monastery, Samyé. They also share common assumptions about what was inherited from India : Buddha provided divergent dispensations relative to trainees, condified by Tibetan doxographers into three distinct vehicles : the Lesser, Greater and Diamond Vehicles. All orders share the Mahāyāna orientation. Moroever, these exegetes also divided the various tenets on emptiness into four main schools : Great Exposition School, Sūtra School, Mind-Only School and Middle Way School. Each is associated with particular lineages, texts, practices, doctrines etc., but the in all orders the Middle Way approach of Nāgārjuna is considered definitive. The heritage of these orders came to them from the scholastic institutions of northern India during the second dissemination of Buddhism and from the "siddha" lineages centered in Bihar & Bengal. Although often defined as "sects", from a Ri-mé approach all schools lead to awakening.

In the late nineteenth century, because of the sectarian orientation of the orders, previously causing competition, persecution and fractional wars, a nonsectarian countermovement was initiated. This "Ri-mé" movement challenged the scholastic approach of the Gelugpa order and focused on Indian "root-texts". However, most of the Lamas adhering to this movement favour the view of "Shentong" or "other-emptiness" (Mipam is a prominent example of a Ri-mé Lama adhering to self-emptiness). In nonsectarian Ri-mé, all schools are find their way to the "great stream" and from their flow into the "great ocean" of Dzogchen. The present studies are inspired by this lofty ideal.

• ca.650 - 775 CE : the Nyingma or advent of Buddhism : During the reign of Songtsän Gampo (ca. 604 - 650), Buddhism came to Tibet from India around the middle of the seventh century CE, resulting in the decline of the native Tibetan culture & religion, shamanistic Bön ("invokation"). During the reign of king Trisong Detsen (742 - 797), Kamalaśila (ca. 700 - 750), Śāntaraksita (ca. 725 - 788) and the Indian tantric master Padmasambhava (?) were invited. He subdued a vast number of evil spirits terrifying the Tibetans. He did not eliminate or annihilate these negative forces, but used them as protectors and/or as fuel for the journey towards enlightenment. In 775, he founded Samyé Monastery, the first Buddhist temple (Tib. "gompa") in Tibet. The first school of Buddhism in Tibet (the so-called "Nyingma" or "old translation school") traces its historical origins back to Padmasambhava and his teachings. He brought the tradition of Dzogchen ("Great Perfection") to Tibet. He hid a great number of teaching in the form of texts (Tib. "terma"). He is also known for the Bardo teachings. Samantabhadra, the Buddha of the Essence of the Wisdom of the Dharmakāya, is the origin of the lineage. He passed it down to Vajrasattva, who transmitted the teaching to Garab Dorje (ca. 55 CE). The Nyingma school divides the Buddhayāna in Nine Graded Vehicles (Hearers, Solitary Realizers, Bodhisattvas, Action Tantra, Performance Tantra, Yoga Tantra, Father Tantra, Mother Tantra & Nondual Tantra).  ;

• 1056 CE : the Kadam school or the revitalization of Buddhism : after the bitter persecution of Buddhism by the Bön-king Langdarma (between 838 & 841 CE), probably assassinated by a Buddhist hermit in 842 CE, Buddhism was revitalized by the Indian master Atiśa (982 - 1054), initiating the so-called "second dissemination". He stayed seventeen years in Tibet and his lay disciple Dromtönpa (1005 - 1064) received and transmitted all of his master's major lineages and "pith instruction spoken by the Buddha" (or "Kadam"). In 1056, the latter founded Reting Monastery near Lhasa, and source of the Kadampa lineage. These Kadampa Masters are outwardly modest but inwardly very advanced, emphasizing mind transformation techniques (Tib. "lojong") and taking & giving (Tib. "tonglen") ;

• 1069 - 1153 CE : the Kagyu school : the Indian mahasiddhas Tilopa (988 - 1069) & Nāropa (1016 - 1100) are the major patriarchs of the Kagyu, or "Ear-Whispered" tradition or Oral Lineage (of spotless practice). Tilopa got them directly from Buddha Vajradhara & Vajrayogini and transmitted them to Nāropa, who passed them on to Marpa Lodro (1012 - 1096), who's heart-son was Jetsun Milarepa (1052 - 1135). The latter transmitted the most powerful instructions of Tilopa to Gampopa (1079 - 1153). Their central doctrine was called "Mahāmudrā", or "Great Seal", directly realizing the emptiness of the mind, leading to instantaneous self-realization of the luminous nature of mind. They are also known for the Six Yogas of Nāropa : inner heat yoga, illusionary body yoga, clear light yoga, yoga of consciousness transference to a higher plane, yoga of consciousness transference to another body & bardo yoga ;

• 1073 - 1151 CE : the Sakya school : in 1073, Gonchok Gyalpo (1034 - 1102) founded Sakya Monastery in southern Tibet (near Shigatse) at a site of grey, pale Earth (Tib. "sakya") spotted as auspicious by Atiśa in 1040. The greatest contribution of this school is known as "The Path and Its Fruit" (Tib. "lamdre"), a system encompassing the entire range of Sūtra and Tantra in terms of the meditational deity Hevajra. These teachings are traced back to the ninth-century Indian mahasiddha Virūpa, a life-long practitioner of the Cakrasamvara Tantra. His teachings were passed on to Gonchok Gyalpo via the scholar and translator Drogmi, a contemporary of Atiśa. Their greatest master was Kunga Gyaltsen (1181 - 1151), better known as Sakya Pandita. Associating themselves with the Mongols, they effectively ruled Tibet (cf.  the Sakya Dynasty between 1268 & 1364) ;

• 1409 CE : the Gelug school : in 1409, Je Tsongkhapa (1357 - 1419), Tibet's most outstanding religious reformer & yogi-scholastic, founded Ganden Monastery, the original gompa of the Gelugpas, the Virtuous Ones. Other names for this school are "Gandenpa", recalling the school's first monastery and "New Kadampa", acknowledging Tsongkhapa's integration & propagation of Atiśa's Kadampa lineage. He collected the three Kadampa lineages and integrated them along with Sakya, Kagyu and other teachings. He also studied Dzogchen. His emphasis on reason, ethics and the analysis of the mind are remarkable. Placing great emphasis on pure moral conduct, the teachings of Tsongkhapa insist upon the absence of conflict between absence of inherent existence (the ultimate nature of emptiness) and valid conventional functioning according to determining laws, or dependent arising. While the Nyingma, Sakya & Kagyu schools formed the "Red Hats", Gelugpas were known as the "Yellow Hats". This iconic distinction points to the powerful new synthesis introduced by Tsongkhapa. His Gelug school was a fusion of lineages from a dozen earlier sects. Even today, this is the most prominent school, having the Dalai Lama among its ranks.

During the golden age of the five schools and their numerous lineages, sects & subsects (775 - 1959), the native Tibetan shamanistic Bön tradition adapted the specifics of Shamanism to Buddhism. It survived and has recently been made part of Tibetan Buddhism by the XIVth Dalai Lama, standing at the same level as the other schools and deemed "the fifth school" (for the Old Kadam was incorporated in the Gelug school).

Yungdrung Bön is the root culture and religion of Tibet. According to historical Bön texts, the kingdom of Zhang Zhung, where these teachings are said to have originated, was the closest neighboring kingdom to Tibet, existing until the end of the eighth century CE. Zhang Zhung extended from what is today the upper part of western Tibet through Nepal, northern India (Kashmir, Ladakh, Zanskar, etc.) to Pakistan (Kashmir) and the Karakoram area in China. Tönpa Shenrab was the legendary founder of the Bön, born 18.000 years ago ! He visited Tibet and introduced a series of practices found in no other form of Buddhism outside Tibet, like putting up prayer flags, making smoke offerings to protectors, performing divination, using astrology, long life rituals, harmonizing the environment, death-rituals, exorcisms, consecrations, empowerments, etc. These shamanistic practices were later successfully adapted to Buddhism, particularly in Tibet. This "New" Bön is organized in nine steps, of which the first four are "causal" and the last five "resultant" or "fruition". The higher-level teachings include Tantra & Dzogchen (the "Great Perfection").

This short overview clearly shows how Tibetan Buddhism, except for Bön, was dependent on India. When Buddhism entered Tibet (ca. 650 CE), Indian Buddhism had already entered its "Tantric" phase, which came to a close in the 11th century with the Kālacakra Tantra. In Tibet, Buddhism was revitalized, giving rise to the Old Kadam, Kagyu & Sakya schools. Again Indian Buddhism initiated ...

The great scholar & encyclopedic writer Bu-ston (1290 - 1364) was primarily associated with putting in order the accumulation of five centuries of vast quantities of texts translated out of Sanskrit & Chinese. But at that time, the Buddhist centers in India had been largely destroyed by the Muslim invaders and Tibet became the principal storehouse of a vast array of Buddhist teachings.

The Tibetans knew very well what they had learned and were able to put this knowledge to practical use in the fields of divination, yoga, magic & Tantra. As a result, they transmitted Indian Buddhist lineages for over more than a millennium (ca. 650 - 1959), while some of the Indian lineages began as early as ca. 150 CE. Novelty and creativity were and are not part of the logic behind the transmission of these lineages. Adaptation perhaps, but never invention. Neither can we say of Tsongkhapa he came up with new concepts or that he was a revolutionary. Gelugpas are known for their scholastic, rationalistic, conservative & pragmatic stand. With Tsongkhapa, the ideal of a final synthesis of all schools had been given body.

Lamaism, the socio-political organization created by the nobility & the various schools, and centralized by the Gelug & the Vth Dalai Lama, has to be understood in this context. Without lineages and their empowerments, much would have been lost. Without the strict Guru/disciple context, pure transmission would have been very difficult, if not impossible. Indeed, despite the vast written corpus of Tibetan Buddhism, directly affecting human memory was and still is the preferred mode of transmission. Such a "personal" approach guarantees the unaltered continuity of the original teachings. If every master teaches his disciple mastership, then the link is never broken. By adhering to this strict discipline, most lineages survived. Thanks to the teachings of the Venerable Rinpoches in the West, much of what was "secret" is now published and so available to a wider number of people, much to the joy of those who wish to see the Buddhadharma flourish everywhere on this planet, and this in a scientific, nonpartisan spirit !

 The Wish-Fulfilling Gem Goes West ?

The following prophetic prediction is attributed to Padmasambhava :

"When the iron bird flies, and horses run on wheels, the Tibetan people will be scattered like ants across the World, and the Dharma will come to the land of the Red Man."

Indeed, since 1959, when Tenzin Gyatso, the Great XIVth Dalai Lama, fled Tibet, the history of the transmission of the Buddhayāna entered a new phase. Before, Lamas would never leave Tibet for the West and their vast & profound teachings were kept secret and in the hands of a small elite (like the Dalai Lamas, Throne Holders, Abbots & Senior Lamas). Since the sixties of the previous century, lots of texts have been translated & published in foreign languages, Western scholarship took up the challenge to scientifically grasp Tibetan history, language, culture, etc. and hosts of Venerable Rinpoches, on prolific donation tours, visited the West to teach, empower & build monasteries. As these teachers worked outside the protective circle of their monastic culture, former "secrets" were divulged with ease and this in a way unseen for over a millennium. After four decades of many excellent translations, teachings, empowerments, monasteries, retreats, etc. the teachings of Lord Buddha were adapted to the Western mind.

What to say about this ?

• a better understanding of Buddhism : before 1959, the West had primarily been in touch with Theravāda, the last surviving school of the Hīnayāna (or Individual Vehicle), and with Zen, the Japanese way of reading the Chinese "ch'an-an" (or "ch'an"), a Mahāyāna school developed in the 6th & 7th centuries CE. It was based on the Dhyāna Buddhism of Bodhidharma (ca. 470 - 543 CE) and on native Taoism. After the exile of the Dalai Lama, a more comprehensive picture rose, in particular of the Mahāyāna & the Vajrayāna ;

• an alternative view on transmission : although Lamas continue to stress the importance of the Guru/disciple relationship, Buddhist teachings have been disseminated without the restrictions at work in Tibet, where chosen disciples (often reincarnated masters or "tulkus") had to spend decades of preparations before receiving any core teachings. Today, numerous books, audio-visual techniques & resident teachers provide the practitioner with all the data needed to practice all Buddhist Vehicles, the Vajrayāna included ;

• an open study & practice of Tantra : in the practice of Tantra , all Lamas stress the importance of empowerments or initiation ("abhiseka"). Some stern Lamas say those who dare to practice without initiation end up as hell-beings ! For Venerable Rinpoches it depends on the individual. In certain rituals, disciples swear oaths which, if broken, condemns him or her to such a special Vajra-hell. Such fear-induction is not productive, and reminds us of the abuses of Medieval Catholicism. Given the vast amount of recent publications on the subject, a constructive study & open practice of Buddhist Tantra is finally possible. If Tantra is so secret, then why publish ? In the Tibetan cultural context, empowerments ensured the purity of the lineage. Nowadays, with all the media in the world, this is hardly necessary, although the personal effect of a ritual of empowerment cannot be denied. As the complexity of Tantra self-protects, the argument saying it cannot be practiced without an Outer Guru is questionable. Without vast compassion, Tantra does not work. It self-secret power is immense ;

• the divorce of Buddhayāna & Lamaism : the complete Buddhist path can be studied & practiced without relying on the hierarchy imposed by Lamaism. The latter seems to reflect the theocratic reflex entrenched in Tibetan culture. The distinction between Tibetan culture and Buddhist spirituality identifies the outdated autoritarian trappings of the Tibetan priesthood ... The notion Lamaism is necessary to guarantee the Vajrayāna is like saying Roman Catholicism is necessary to guarantee the purity of Christianity, a position untenable since the Reformation ;

• the rise of new Buddhist schools : the fact inner tensions between the Lamas-in-exile have given rise to renegate schools (cf. the conflict between the XIVth Dalai Lama & the New Kadampa Tradition), proves the point of laicism and the concept of a secular state, stressing the absence of religious interference in government affairs and vice versa. Such secularism allows for the rise of new schools, movements & groups, allowing Buddhism to diversify and adapt to the modern, postmodern and hypermodern way of life. The fact the current Dalai Lama is a reborn lineage holder of all Tibetan schools, runs against this pluralism and legitimizes a monist, theocratic view on Vajrayāna Buddhism. History shows this approach is possible, but the question is whether it is still tenable today and in the future.

 Critical Considerations

Judaism, Christianity & Islam lack historical authenticity. Indeed, canonization, usually initiated after the demise of the founding mystic, often recontextualizes, interpolates and "adapts" the original teaching, allowing some to be lost for posterity. In Judaism, the redaction of the Torah has had many historical layers (cf. the Pentateuch, the work of Ezra, the Septuagint, Rabbinical tradition after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE). In Christianity, the difference between Q, the source-teachings of the Jesus-people and the New Testament of the orthodox centrists is remarkable. Also in Islam, the various redactions of the Koran made it possible to posit different historical readings, sectarian interpretations & levels of meaning, as Sufism clearly demonstrates.

Buddhism is not a "religion of the book", and so offers no revelation. Being non-theist or transtheist, its "scriptures" are Dharma teachings intended to assist those seeking enlightenment. By imagining 84.000 Dharma doctrines, the Buddhadharma point to the open, flexible nature of the Dharma, its capacity to change & adapt to new circumstances and new audiences. Just as scientists continue to discover new kinds of medicine, Bodhisattvas and Buddhas are able to devise new skillful means to liberate & enlighten sentient beings. This sets Buddhism apart as a dynamic religion.

Hence, within the context of the Four Turnings, new Buddhist scriptures may see the light. Absence of closure implies continuous change & (re)adaptation (so absent in theist theologies). So the goal of the Buddhadharma is not a life in accord with the fixed commandments of God, Gods, Goddesses or Buddhas, rewarding us in heaven or punishing us in hell, but actual Buddhahood, the unconditional state of true peace hic et nunc. In the Mahāyāna, this concrete goal is realized for the sake of all sentient beings, and, using the resultant technology of Tantrayāna, may even be ours in this lifetime.